Leave Your Message
LFPE0103B00

PE01-M5×10.5-9.0ET

PE01 PCB Connectors

PE01 Series Press-fit

Suitable for high current line to board and board to board connections, fuse connections
Easy installation, high reliability, strong stability, and low solderless resistance
Very suitable for continuous current and peak current
Suitable for harsh environments
Can provide customized UNC threads
 
 
PRESS-FIT installation process
Compliant with IEC352-5
Pressing force: minimum 40N for a single needle
Pullout force: Single needle minimum 30N (after 24 hours of installation)
Installation speed: 100-250 mm/min
PCB board thickness: 1.6-3.2mm
REQUEST SAMPLES
M Thread size M5x0.8
T1 Thread Length 6.0 mm
H Total Height 10.5 mm
H1 Body Length 7.0 mm
L Section Size 9.0 mm
Pins 8
Current rating 160 A
Tigntening Torque 2.2 Nm
Materials Brass
Surface Treatment Tin plated
Installation Equipment/Method Press-fit
Type  PE01nzv

Is Press Fit better than push fit?

When comparing press-fit and push-fit (often referred to as “snap-fit” or “friction-fit”) technologies for attaching components to printed circuit boards (PCBs), it is important to understand the characteristics and benefits of each method. Here is a breakdown of the two methods:

● Press Fit
advantage:
Mechanical stability: The press-fit connection provides a strong and reliable mechanical bond, which is very useful in high-vibration environments.
No heating required: The process does not involve heating, reducing the risk of heat damage to sensitive components.
Reworkability: Press-fit components can usually be removed and replaced without damaging the PCB, making repairs easier.
Consistent Quality: Crimp technology produces consistent and repeatable connections, improving overall product reliability.

shortcoming:
Cost: Press-fit assemblies and necessary tooling can be more expensive than push-fit options.
Assembly Complexity: The assembly process may require specialized equipment and may be more complex.

● Push Fit
advantage:
Simple: Push-fit connections are generally easier to assemble because they usually rely on a simple mechanical engagement and do not require specialized tools.
Cost-effective: Push-fit assemblies are cheaper than press-fit assemblies, so for some applications, push-fit assemblies are a more economical choice.
Flexibility: Push-fit designs can accommodate a range of tolerances and may be easier to implement in a variety of designs.

shortcoming:
Mechanical reliability: Push-in connections may not provide the same level of mechanical stability as press-in connections, especially in high-vibration environments.
Potential for Loosening: Push-fit connections may be more susceptible to loosening over time, especially when subjected to repeated pressure or movement.